Pharmacokinetic-based failure of a detergent virucidal for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) nasal infections: A preclinical study and randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The nose is the portal for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, suggesting the nose as a target for topical antiviral therapies. The purpose of this study was to assess both the in vivo and in vitro efficacy of a detergent-based virucidal agent, Johnson and Johnson's Baby Shampoo (J&J), in SARS-CoV-2-infected subjects. METHODS: Subjects were randomized into three treatment groups: (1) twice daily nasal irrigation with J&J in hypertonic saline, (2) hypertonic saline alone, and (3) no intervention. Complementary in vitro experiments were performed in cultured human nasal epithelia. The primary outcome measure in the clinical trial was change in SARS-CoV-2 viral load over 21 days. Secondary outcomes included symptom scores and change in daily temperature. Outcome measures for in vitro studies included change in viral titers. RESULTS: Seventy-two subjects completed the clinical study (n = 24 per group). Despite demonstrated safety and robust efficacy in in vitro virucidal assays, J&J irrigations had no impact on viral titers or symptom scores in treated subjects relative to controls. Similar findings were observed administering J&J to infected cultured human airway epithelia using protocols mimicking the clinical trial regimen. Additional studies of cultured human nasal epithelia demonstrated that lack of efficacy reflected pharmacokinetic failure, with the most virucidal J&J detergent components rapidly absorbed from nasal surfaces. CONCLUSION: In this randomized clinical trial of subjects with SARS-CoV-2 infection, a topical detergent-based virucidal agent had no effect on viral load or symptom scores. Complementary in vitro studies confirmed a lack of efficacy, reflective of pharmacokinetic failure and rapid absorption from nasal surfaces.

Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Inhaled Treprostinil for Patients at Risk for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Rationale: Inhaled treprostinil may improve oxygenation and have additional antiinflammatory effects in early acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, potentially preventing or reducing the severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).Objectives: To determine whether administration of inhaled treprostinil to patients at risk for ARDS is feasible, safe, and efficacious.Methods: We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center randomized pilot trial at a quaternary care academic medical center. Patients with acute hypoxemia due to pneumonia or signs of low-pressure pulmonary edema with a unilateral or bilateral infiltrate on chest imaging and a 4 L/min supplemental oxygen requirement not requiring positive pressure ventilation were evaluated. Randomized patients received study drug or placebo (2:1 ratio). Treatment was initiated at 6 breaths every 4 hours and titrated up to 12 breaths. Subjects were maintained on treatment for 7 days and then tapered off over a period of 4 days. Study drug was stopped if positive pressure ventilation was required (invasive or noninvasive).Results: Fourteen patients were enrolled over a period of 31 months. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between treatment groups with respect to age, sex, race, Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation score, lung injury prediction score, or baseline mean oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2):fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio. Trends in daily baseline and 30-minute postdose SpO2:FiO2 ratio for all treatment points were not significantly different between placebo and treprostinil. Four patients required positive pressure ventilation in the treprostinil group versus one in the placebo group.Conclusions: Inhaled treprostinil administration is feasible in patients at risk for ARDS but was not associated with improvement in the SpO2:FiO2 ratio relative to placebo. Drug-associated adverse events were not severe nor unexpected based on the known adverse effect profile of inhaled treprostinil. The clinical benefit of this intervention is unclear at this time in the absence of larger studies.Clinical trial registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02370095).

Pharmacokinetic-based failure of a detergent virucidal for SARS-COV-2 nasal infections.

The nose is the portal for SARS-CoV-2 infection, suggesting the nose as a target for topical antiviral therapies. Because detergents are virucidal, Johnson and Johnson's Baby Shampoo (J&J) was tested as a topical virucidal agent in SARS-CoV-2 infected subjects. Twice daily irrigation of J&J in hypertonic saline, hypertonic saline alone, or no intervention were compared (n = 24/group). Despite demonstrated safety and robust efficacy in in vitro virucidal assays, J&J irrigations had no impact on viral titers or symptom scores in treated subjects relative to controls. Similar findings were observed administering J&J to infected cultured human airway epithelia using protocols mimicking the clinical trial regimen. Additional studies of cultured human nasal epithelia demonstrated that lack of efficacy reflected pharmacokinetic failure, with the most virucidal J&J detergent components rapidly absorbed from nasal surfaces. This study emphasizes the need to assess the pharmacokinetic characteristics of virucidal agents on airway surfaces to guide clinical trials.

Bronchoalveolar Tregs are associated with duration of mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) play essential roles in immune homeostasis and repair of damaged lung tissue. We hypothesized that patients whose lung injury resolves quickly, as measured by time to liberation from mechanical ventilation, have a higher percentage of Tregs amongst CD4+ T cells in either airway, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) or peripheral blood samples. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients with ARDS requiring mechanical ventilation and collected serial samples, the first within 72 h of ARDS diagnosis (day 0) and the second 48-96 h later (day 3). We analyzed immune cell populations and cytokines in BAL, tracheal aspirates and peripheral blood, as well as cytokines in plasma, obtained at the time of bronchoscopy. The study cohort was divided into fast resolvers (FR; n = 8) and slow resolvers (SR; n = 5), based on the median number of days until first extubation for all participants (n = 13). The primary measure was the percentage of CD4+ T cells that were Tregs. RESULTS: The BAL of FR contained more Tregs than SR. This finding did not extend to Tregs in tracheal aspirates or blood. BAL Tregs expressed more of the full-length FOXP3 than a splice variant missing exon 2 compared to Tregs in simultaneously obtained peripheral blood. CONCLUSION: Tregs are present in the bronchoalveolar space during ARDS. A greater percentage of CD4+ cells were Tregs in the BAL of FR than SR. Tregs may play a role in the resolution of ARDS, and enhancing their numbers or functions may be a therapeutic target.